Concept, way of production of noted artwork above is registered under ©™

Case law related: All segments noted above, titled as specific art performances and it’s procedural, designs are copyrighted. Star Athletica L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. The Copyright Act of 1976 provides that “pictorial, graphic, or sculptural features” of the “design of a useful article” are eligible for copyright protection as artistic works if those features “can be identified separately from, and are capable of existing independently of, the utilitarian aspects of the article.”

Copyright law: Wojnarowicz v. American Family Association, 745 F. Supp. 130 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) Rogers v. Koons, 960 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1992); Fairey v. Associated Press, No. 09-01123 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). Case law: Rabbit town v. Chris Burgen: Warhol v. Goldsmith.

Further continue to enjoy our visits to Los Angeles galleries. Here we interview the art crowd who is eager to review the artists’ paintings of the moment.